Pilot & Feasibility Studies · PILOT-SS
Sample Size for Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Plan a sample around the feasibility question the pilot must answer—not around an intervention effect.
4. Required pilot size
Planning record
| Item | Finding |
|---|
Progression decision boundaries
| Decision | Observed count |
|---|
Protocol reporting
Methods
Sample-size justification
Combine several feasibility objectives0 of 6 requirements
Calculate a requirement, then add it here to compare compatible denominators.
The largest compatible requirement determines each denominator-specific target. Participant counts and site-time remain separate.
| Objective | Method | Denominator | Requirement | Action |
|---|
About this calculator
Scope
This calculator supports external pilot trials and quantitative feasibility studies. It does not establish intervention efficacy or safety, replace protocol-specific statistical consultation, or determine progression by itself.
Why the denominator matters
Recruitment uptake uses eligible people approached; retention uses randomized participants; fidelity may use the intervention arm; and recruitment rates use site-time. Requirements with different denominators must not be treated as interchangeable.
Implemented methods
- PILOT-PROP-CI: two-sided Wilson score intervals, directional one-sided Wilson limits, and a separately labelled BMJ tutorial compatibility convention for a feasibility proportion.
- PILOT-RATE-CI: Poisson score precision for a recruitment or other event rate.
- PILOT-PROG-PROP: Lewis normal-approximation progression design with continuity correction.
- PILOT-PROG-RATE: exact one-sample Poisson progression design.
- PILOT-PROBLEM: probability of observing at least one important problem.
Important method detail
The recommended proportion method uses Wilson—not the Wald formula used by the general single-proportion calculator. The directional Wilson option directly constrains the selected upper or lower limit. BMJ tutorial compatibility instead reproduces the companion app's presize Wilson-width convention and is reported separately. For an anticipated 80%, two-sided 95% confidence, and a 10-percentage-point half-width, Wilson requires 60 denominator units. Progression-proportion results are always rounded upward.
When not to use this calculator
Do not use it to test efficacy, derive an intervention effect from a small pilot, formally assess safety, optimize a continuous-outcome variance estimate, or plan a clustered, adaptive, multilevel, or internally piloted design without protocol-specific statistical work.
References
- Ying X, et al. Determining sample size for pilot trials: a tutorial. BMJ. 2025;390:e083405.
- Eldridge SM, et al. CONSORT extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ. 2016;355:i5239.
- Lewis M, et al. Determining sample size for progression criteria for pragmatic pilot RCTs. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 2021;7:40.
- Viechtbauer W, et al. A simple formula for calculation of sample size in pilot studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:1375–1379.
Research-planning disclaimer: Review the feasibility objective, denominator, assumptions, progression criteria, and calculation before using a result in a protocol.
Suggested citation
Yaacob, Najib Majdi. “Sample Size for Pilot and Feasibility Studies.” Web calculator. NajibMY, 2026. Accessed September 9, 2026. https://najibmy.netlify.app/tools/sample-size/pilot-feasibility-studies/.