Diagnostic Accuracy · AUC-1S
Sample Size for Testing One AUC
Plan sample size for testing whether a diagnostic test's anticipated ROC AUC is better than a prespecified benchmark.
4. Results
Enter the one-AUC testing assumptions and select Calculate.
Suggested sample-size wording
Warnings
Formula, assumptions, limitations, and methodological note
Example clinical scenario
A researcher tests whether a new cardiac biomarker discriminates patients with and without acute myocardial infarction better than a prespecified benchmark AUC.
Formula and methodological note
Scope and limitations: Use this calculator only for the diagnostic design named on this page and its stated independent or paired sampling assumptions. It does not cover clustering, repeated lesions, multiple-reader designs, prediction-model development, or non-inferiority/equivalence unless explicitly stated. The implemented normal or binormal approximation may be unsuitable near parameter boundaries or with sparse reference-standard groups. Where prevalence is used, it supports recruitment planning and does not necessarily form part of the core precision or hypothesis-test calculation.
This calculator tests H0: AUC = AUC0 against H1: AUC = AUC0 + Delta, where AUC1 is greater than AUC0. It uses Hajian-Tilaki's binormal approximation with the standard-deviation ratio assumed approximately 1.
H0: AUC = AUC0
H1: AUC = AUC0 + Delta = AUC1
a(AUC) = sqrt(2) x Phi^-1(AUC)
Balanced 1:1: V(AUC) = 0.0099 x exp[-a(AUC)^2 / 2] x [6a(AUC)^2 + 16]
n per group = ceiling([Z alpha x sqrt(V(AUC0)) + Z power x sqrt(V(AUC1))]^2 / Delta^2)
Consecutive/cross-sectional: W(AUC, prevalence) = 0.0099 x exp[-a(AUC)^2 / 2] x [(5a(AUC)^2 + 8) / prevalence + (a(AUC)^2 + 8) / (1 - prevalence)]
N = ceiling([Z alpha x sqrt(W(AUC0, prevalence)) + Z power x sqrt(W(AUC1, prevalence))]^2 / Delta^2)
Z alpha = Phi^-1(1 - alpha / 2) for a two-sided test, or Phi^-1(1 - alpha) for one-sided superiority.
Z power = Phi^-1(power)
Methodological note: This calculator is intended for a single diagnostic test with a continuous or ordinal index test and a binary reference standard. It does not cover paired AUC comparison, clustering, repeated lesions within participants, or multiple-reader ROC studies.
Technical results
Method references
- Hajian-Tilaki K. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2014;48:193-204. Eq. 7.5; variance from Eq. 7.4 / Appendix B.
Suggested citation
Yaacob, Najib Majdi. “Sample Size for Testing One AUC (AUC-1S).” Web calculator. NajibMY, 2026. Accessed July 29, 2026. https://najibmy.netlify.app/tools/sample-size/diagnostic-accuracy/one-auc/.