Clinical Trial Designs · Cluster-Randomized Trials
Cluster-Randomized Equivalence Trial — Binary Outcome
Plan a two-arm parallel cluster-randomized trial in which the confidence interval for an experimental-minus-reference event-risk difference must lie entirely inside prespecified equivalence limits.
How this calculator works
The calculator evaluates both one-sided tests jointly using anticipated arm-specific Bernoulli variances and a finite-cluster variance-factor approximation. Limits are entered in percentage points; the contrast always remains experimental minus reference.
The calculator does not choose or justify the equivalence limits. A nonsignificant superiority test does not establish equivalence. The estimand, limits, analysis population, missing-data strategy, and sensitivity analyses require protocol-specific justification.
4. Results
Review the TOST hypotheses, enter the assumptions, and select Calculate.
Analyzable design and recruitment target
| Arm | Analyzable clusters | Analyzable participants | Expected events | Recruit clusters | Recruit participants |
|---|
ICC sensitivity analysis
| ICC | Design effect | Experimental clusters | Reference clusters | Total |
|---|
Suggested sample-size wording
Planning warnings
Formula, assumptions, limitations, and methodological note
Example clinical scenario
Community clinics are randomized to two implementation programmes. Investigators want to establish that six-month clinical-response probabilities are equivalent within prespecified absolute risk-difference limits.
Formula and methodological note
Equivalence requires both one-sided tests to reject. For each candidate allocation, the calculator integrates the shared confidence-interval containment event over a finite-cluster chi-square variance factor. The standard error uses arm-specific Bernoulli variances inflated by the common cluster design effect.
Equal-size DE = 1 + (m − 1)ρ. Variable-size DE = 1 + ([(1 + CV²)m] − 1)ρ. This is a planning approximation, not an exact clustered-binary mixed-model, GEE, score, beta-binomial, matched, or stepped-wedge method.
Technical results
References
- European Medicines Agency. Guideline on the choice of the non-inferiority margin. EMEA/CPMP/EWP/2158/99.
- Campbell MK, et al. CONSORT extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2012;345:e5661.
- Eldridge SM, Ashby D, Kerry S. Sample size for cluster randomized trials and cluster-size variation. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35:1292–1300.
Privacy: Calculations run locally in your browser. Values are not uploaded by this calculator.
Planning disclaimer: This tool supports research planning and does not replace protocol-specific statistical consultation.
Suggested citation
Yaacob, Najib Majdi. “Cluster-Randomized Equivalence Trial — Binary Outcome.” Web calculator. NajibMY, 2026. Accessed August 19, 2026. http://127.0.0.1:4321/tools/sample-size/clinical-complex-study-designs/cluster-randomized-equivalence-binary-outcome/.